Appeals 2018

Appellants: Uber Singapore Technology Pte Ltd, Lion City Holdings Pte Ltd, Lion City Rentals Pte Ltd, LCRF Pte Ltd and Lion City Automobiles Pte Ltd

Date Received: Notice of Appeal received on 20 October 2018

Summary of CCCS Decision that Appeal Relates:

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore ("CCCS") has issued an Infringement Decision ("ID") against Grab and Uber in relation to the sale of Uber's Southeast Asian business to Grab for a 27.5% stake in Grab in return (the "Transaction"). The Transaction was completed on 26 March 2018. CCCS found that the Transaction has led to a substantial lessening of competition in the provision of ride-hailing platform services in Singapore.

Read the full text of the Infringement Decision [PDF, 2.6 MB]

Relief Sought by Appellants:

Liability and financial penalty

Appellants: Gold Chic Poultry Supply Pte Ltd and Hua Kun Food Industry Pte Ltd

Date Received: Notice of Appeal received on 9 November 2018

Summary of CCCS Decision that Appeal Relates:

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (“CCCS”) has issued an Infringement Decision (“ID”) against 13 fresh chicken distributors (“the Parties”) for engaging in anti-competitive agreements to coordinate the amount and timing of price increases, and agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers in the market for the supply of fresh chicken products in Singapore.

The Parties are:

1. Gold Chic Poultry Supply Pte. Ltd.;

2. Hua Kun Food Industry Pte. Ltd.;

3. Hy-fresh Industries (S) Pte. Ltd.;

4. Kee Song Food Corporation (S) Pte. Ltd. (formerly Kee Song Brothers Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

5. Lee Say Poultry Industrial and its sole-proprietor, Lee Say Group Pte. Ltd.;

6. Hup Heng Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.;

7. Leong Hup Food Pte. Ltd. (formerly KSB Distribution Pte. Ltd.) and its holding company, ES Food International Pte. Ltd.;

8. Prestige Fortune (S) Pte. Ltd.;

9. Ng Ai Food Industries Pte. Ltd. (formerly Ng Ai Muslim Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

10. Sinmah Poultry Processing (S) Pte. Ltd.;

11. Toh Thye San Farm;

12. Tong Huat Poultry Processing Factory Pte. Ltd.; and

13. Ban Hong Poultry Pte. Ltd.

Read the full text of the Infringement Decision [PDF, 1.8 MB]

Relief Sought by Appellants: Liability and financial penalty

Appellant: Toh Thye San Farm

Date Received: Notice of Appeal received on 12 November 2018

Summary of CCCS Decision that Appeal Relates:

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (“CCCS”) has issued an Infringement Decision (“ID”) against 13 fresh chickendistributors (“the Parties”) for engaging in anti-competitive agreements to coordinate the amount and timing of price increases, and agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers in the market for the supply of fresh chicken products in Singapore.

The Parties are:

1. Gold Chic Poultry Supply Pte. Ltd.;

2. Hua Kun Food Industry Pte. Ltd.;

3. Hy-fresh Industries (S) Pte. Ltd.;

4. Kee Song Food Corporation (S) Pte. Ltd. (formerly Kee Song Brothers Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

5. Lee Say Poultry Industrial and its sole-proprietor, Lee Say Group Pte. Ltd.;

6. Hup Heng Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.;

7. Leong Hup Food Pte. Ltd. (formerly KSB Distribution Pte. Ltd.) and its holding company, ES Food International Pte. Ltd.;

8. Prestige Fortune (S) Pte. Ltd.;

9. Ng Ai Food Industries Pte. Ltd. (formerly Ng Ai Muslim Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

10. Sinmah Poultry Processing (S) Pte. Ltd.;

11. Toh Thye San Farm;

12. Tong Huat Poultry Processing Factory Pte. Ltd.; and

13. Ban Hong Poultry Pte. Ltd.

Read the full text of the Infringement Decision [PDF, 1.8 MB]

Relief Sought by Appellant: Liability and financial penalty

Appellant: Kee Song Food Corporation (S) Pte Ltd

Date Received: Notice of Appeal received on 12 November 2018

Summary of CCCS Decision that Appeal Relates:

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (“CCCS”) has issued an Infringement Decision (“ID”) against 13 fresh chicken distributors (“the Parties”) for engaging in anti-competitive agreements to coordinate the amount and timing of price increases, and agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers in the market for the supply of fresh chicken products in Singapore.

The Parties are:

1. Gold Chic Poultry Supply Pte. Ltd.;

2. Hua Kun Food Industry Pte. Ltd.;

3. Hy-fresh Industries (S) Pte. Ltd.;

4. Kee Song Food Corporation (S) Pte. Ltd. (formerly Kee Song Brothers Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

5. Lee Say Poultry Industrial and its sole-proprietor, Lee Say Group Pte. Ltd.;

6. Hup Heng Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.;

7. Leong Hup Food Pte. Ltd. (formerly KSB Distribution Pte. Ltd.) and its holding company, ES Food International Pte. Ltd.;

8. Prestige Fortune (S) Pte. Ltd.;

9. Ng Ai Food Industries Pte. Ltd. (formerly Ng Ai Muslim Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

10. Sinmah Poultry Processing (S) Pte. Ltd.;

11. Toh Thye San Farm;

12. Tong Huat Poultry Processing Factory Pte. Ltd.; and

13. Ban Hong Poultry Pte. Ltd.

Read the full text of the Infringement Decision [PDF, 1.8 MB]

Relief Sought by Appellant: Financial penalty

Appellants: Lee Say Group (consisting of Lee Say Group Pte Ltd/Lee Say Poultry Industrial, Hup Heng Poultry Industries Pte Ltd, Prestige Fortune (S) Pte Ltd, Leong Hup Food Pte Ltd and its holding company, Food International Pte Ltd)

Date Received: Notice of Appeal received on 12 November 2018

Summary of CCCS Decision that Appeal Relates:

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (“CCCS”) has issued an Infringement Decision (“ID”) against 13 fresh chickendistributors (“the Parties”) for engaging in anti-competitive agreements to coordinate the amount and timing of price increases, and agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers in the market for the supply of fresh chicken products in Singapore.

The Parties are:

1. Gold Chic Poultry Supply Pte. Ltd.;

2. Hua Kun Food Industry Pte. Ltd.;

3. Hy-fresh Industries (S) Pte. Ltd.;

4. Kee Song Food Corporation (S) Pte. Ltd. (formerly Kee Song Brothers Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

5. Lee Say Poultry Industrial and its sole-proprietor, Lee Say Group Pte. Ltd.;

6. Hup Heng Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.;

7. Leong Hup Food Pte. Ltd. (formerly KSB Distribution Pte. Ltd.) and its holding company, ES Food International Pte. Ltd.;

8. Prestige Fortune (S) Pte. Ltd.;

9. Ng Ai Food Industries Pte. Ltd. (formerly Ng Ai Muslim Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

10. Sinmah Poultry Processing (S) Pte. Ltd.;

11. Toh Thye San Farm;

12. Tong Huat Poultry Processing Factory Pte. Ltd.; and

13. Ban Hong Poultry Pte. Ltd.

Read the full text of the Infringement Decision [PDF, 1.8 MB]

Relief Sought by Appellants: Liability and financial penalty

Appellant: Ng Ai Food Industries Pte Ltd

Date Received: Notice of Appeal received on 11 January 2019

Summary of CCCS Decision that Appeal Relates:

The Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (“CCCS”) has issued an Infringement Decision (“ID”) against 13 fresh chickendistributors (“the Parties”) for engaging in anti-competitive agreements to coordinate the amount and timing of price increases, and agreeing not to compete for each other’s customers in the market for the supply of fresh chicken products in Singapore.

The Parties are:

1. Gold Chic Poultry Supply Pte. Ltd.;

2. Hua Kun Food Industry Pte. Ltd.;

3. Hy-fresh Industries (S) Pte. Ltd.;

4. Kee Song Food Corporation (S) Pte. Ltd. (formerly Kee Song Brothers Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

5. Lee Say Poultry Industrial and its sole-proprietor, Lee Say Group Pte. Ltd.;

6. Hup Heng Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.;

7. Leong Hup Food Pte. Ltd. (formerly KSB Distribution Pte. Ltd.) and its holding company, ES Food International Pte. Ltd.;

8. Prestige Fortune (S) Pte. Ltd.;

9. Ng Ai Food Industries Pte. Ltd. (formerly Ng Ai Muslim Poultry Industries Pte. Ltd.);

10. Sinmah Poultry Processing (S) Pte. Ltd.;

11. Toh Thye San Farm;

12. Tong Huat Poultry Processing Factory Pte. Ltd.; and

13. Ban Hong Poultry Pte. Ltd.

Read the full text of the Infringement Decision [PDF, 1.8 MB]

Relief Sought by Appellant: Liability and financial penalty